One of the major issues in the Democratic primary for City Council is the Meadowcreek Parkway. I am unclear on two things:(1) Where do the three candidates stand on the parkway?
(2) What can Council do at this point, regardless of councilors' positions?
An article by Rachana Dixit, in yesterday's Progress (it's here), summarizes the candidates' positions, as presented during a forum the prior evening, as follows:
- Dave Norris: "Vehemently against the parkway" - he said that its only upside was limited traffic alleviation off of Park Street
- Kristin Szakos: Does not support the parkway, but believes it's now "too late to turn back without a court’s intervention"
- Julian Taliaferro: Supports the parkway because of the money that the City's already invested in it ("I’m not willing to gamble $5 million of our money")
209. Has Julian Taliaferro decided it's too late to change his position on the parkway (perhaps thinking that a revised position would make it look like he's just shopping for votes)? I thought that Taliaferro signaled reconsideration of his position, but this article makes it sounds like he is reconsidering his reconsideration.
210. Will there be any stoplights on the parkway (a la the 250 bypass)? Or will it truly be a parkway?
211. Are bike and/or running trails incorporated into the design?
212. Which is the bigger concern for County and/or City officials: getting the 29 North people (Hollymead, etc.) to downtown, or vice versa?
213. Are the politicians in Lynchburg, Danville, and other southern Virginia communities complaining that we're focusing all of our political debate/energy on the parkway rather than on a 29 bypass?
214. At the recent McIntire Pool Council meeting, David Brown cited to prior councilors' actions to defend his votes on the parkway. Which councilors, historically, were most in favor of making the parkway happen? Which were most opposed?
